The comparison among AAC/ALC new building material and traditional materials | |||||
S/NO | Description | Autoclaved Aerated Lightweight Concrete(ALC)Panel | Hollow Core Panel Product | Red Brick | Precast Concrete |
| Product Images |
|
|
|
|
1 | Working Density | 770kg/m³ | 1680kg/m³ | 1800kg/m³ | 2400kg/m³ |
2 | Fire Rating (Based on | 4 Hours | 1 Hour | 1 Hour | 1 Hour |
3 | Thermal Conductivity (K Value) | 0.13 | 0.656 | 0.807 | 1.442 |
4 | U-Value (5mm skim Coat | 1.05 | 2.983 | 3.261 | 3.967 |
5 | Sound Insulation | STC 43(100mm Thickness) | STC 44(90mm Thickness) | STC 35-40 | STC 45 |
6 | Compression Strength | >=4.5N/mm² | 15.0N/mm² | 3.5N/mm² | >=17N/mm² |
7 | Strength and Robustess | Meet Severe Duty(SD)Test | Meet Severe Duty Test | Meet SD Test Requirement | Meet SD Test Requirement |
8 | Water Absorption | Passed (based on BS EN 772) | Passed (based on SS 271) | Passed (based on SS 271) | Passed (based on SS 271) |
9 | Heavy Weight Anchorage | Can hang heavy loads without | Need toinfill hollow holes | Can hang heavy loads | Can hang heavy loads |
10 | Installation Team | Minimum 2 persons | Minimum 4 persons | Minimum 1 persons | Minimum 4 persons |
11 | Installation Productivity | 20-40m²/man-day | 10-20m²/man-day | 5-10m²/man-day | 10-20m²/man-day |
12 | Curing Time | Fully cured in autoclaved machine | Not fully cured before delivery | Not fully cured before | Not fully cured before |
13 | Wastage | 2-5% | 10-30% | 3-5% | 3-5% |
14 | Lintel and stiffener Usage | Low | High | High | High |
15 | Building Structure | Saving of structure cost 15-20% | No Saving | No Saving | No Saving |
16 | Transportation | Much less trips are | Much more trips required | Much more trips required | Much more trips required |
17 | Rectification Works | Less rectification works | More rectification works | More rectification works | More rectification works |
18 | Reusability | Panels can be cut and reuse | NO | NO | NO |
19 | Energy Saving | Saving aircon energy of upto 30% | Not energy efficient | Not energy efficient | Not energy efficient |
20 | Green Product | Greatly reduce CO2 Emission duo to it's great thermal insulation capability and lightweight | Weak thermal insulation | Weak thermal insulation | Weak thermal insulation |
intensity level | A2.5 | A3.5 | A5.0 | A7.5 | |
dry density level | B04 | B05 | B06 | B07 | |
dry density (kg / m3) | ≤ 425 | ≤ 525 | ≤ 625 | ≤ 725 | |
compressive strength MPa | average value | ≥ 2.5 | ≥ 3.5 | ≥ 5.0 | ≥ 7.5 |
single group minimum value | ≥ 2.0 | ≥ 2.8 | ≥ 4.0 | ≥ 6.0 | |
dry shrinkage mm / M | rapid test method | ≤ 0.8 | ≤ 0.8 | ≤ 0.8 | ≤ 0.8 |
standard method | ≤ 0.5 | ≤ 0.5 | ≤ 0.5 | ≤ 0.5 | |
frost resistance | quality loss /% ≤ | ≤ 5.0 | |||
strength after freezing MPa ≥ | More than 80% of the average cube compressive strength | ||||
thermal conductivity (thousand state) w / m.k ≤ | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.18 |
Serial number | Product name | Specification L × B × H (mm) | Shape | |
With Groove | Flat | |||
1 | Exterior wall panel
| ≤4800×600×200 | √ |
|
2 | ≤4800×600×175 | √ |
| |
3 | ≤4800×600×150 | √ |
| |
4 | ≤4500×600×125 | √ |
| |
5 | ≤3500×600×100 | √ |
| |
6 | Inner wall panel
| ≤4800×600×150 | √ |
|
7 | ≤4800×600×125 | √ |
| |
8 | ≤4000×600×100 | √ |
| |
9 | ≤3000×600×75 | √ |
| |
10 | Roof panel
| ≤4800×600×200 | √ |
|
11 | ≤4800×600×175 | √ |
| |
12 | ≤4200×600×150 | √ |
| |
13 | ≤3500×600×125 | √ |
| |
14 | ≤3000×600×100 | √ |
| |
15 | ≤2000×600×75 | √ |
| |
16 | floor | ≤4000×600×200 | √ |
|
17 | ≤3500×600×175 | √ |
| |
18 | ≤3100×600×150 | √ |
| |
19 | ≤2700×600×125 | √ |
| |
20 | ≤2400×600×100 | √ |
| |
21 | Thin insulation board
| ≤ 1500×600×50 |
| √ |
22 | ≤ 1800×600×50 |
| √ | |
23 | ≤ 2000×600×50 |
| √ |